On the 14th of April, Prothom Alo, a leading
Bangla newspaper, on its site published a short story, “TV Camerar Shamne
Meyeti” (The girl in front of the TV camera), which was also published in the
daily’s Pahela Baishakh supplement. The short
story, titled “TV Camerar Samne Meyeti” (The girl in front of the TV
camera), centres around a politically active girl ‘Seema’ leading the slogan
shouting brigade who is sexually exploited by a senior politician, the man who
recruits her. The story suggests her popularity stems from her sexual
free-mixing with males. The setting of the story also clearly alludes to her
strong involvement with the Shahbagh movement.
The online community reacted almost instantly. Pro-Shahbagh
activists saw it as a direct attack against the movement, while critics of
Shahbag saw it as just another straw to confirm that Shahbag was not only
politically selective but also morally corrupt. Pro-Shahbag activists and
readers were vocal and active in their protests. In a letter to Matiur Rahman,
editor of Prothom Alo, women’s rights activists, including Rokeya Kabir, Khushi
Kabir and Rokeya Rafique, under the banner Begum Rokeya Mancha, termed Hye’s
story as “pornography”. They demanded a joint statement from the writer, editor
and literature editor of Prothom Alo stating that the “descriptions in the
story are false”.
Meanwhile, supporters of Shahbag along with students under the banner of
Bikhhubdho Chhatra Samaj burnt copies of Prothom Alo at Dhaka University’s TSC on
the 15th of April, condemning the publication of the story.
In face of such ambivalent reactions, Prothom Alo apologised
to readers for hurting their sentiments. Hasnat Abdul Hye, the writer of the
story, too, regretted writing the piece and said it would not be included in
any of his works. The daily retracted the story from its online version and
e-paper. In a statement, Prothom Alo Editor Matiur Rahman said the contents of
the story were against the guiding principles of the newspaper.
On a cursory look, the story was indeed vulgar and
demeaning. It was certainly not representative of women who had joined Shahbag.
What however the story strongly alludes to is an imaginative scenario of the
low status of women in the current political climate of Bangladesh and the
extent of sacrifice of one’s morality in order to avail the taste of power. The
story, in its portrayal, frightfully conforms to the prevalent social and political
climate in Bangladesh, including Shahbag.
The character ‘Seema’ may be poor, struggling and reality focused
but she is not ignorant and has willfully made her choices. She believes that
sleeping with a powerful leader is morally wrong, but she has no qualms about
it. It is born out of necessity. So is the political activity, which she says
is her way of income. The end result is a vicious cycle where hapless women
have nothing left to give after they submit to the demands and needs of their
mentors, leaders and powerful colleagues in politics, in return for a life of agitation,
hard work, booze and drugs and of course, the thrill; all culminating towards an
alarming level of moral degradation. The cycle is vicious and unrelenting, and
there is no escape.
Is this the scenario of politics in Bangladesh? Perhaps. Let
us see.
The simple indicator according to me is the impunity enjoyed
by the Chatroleague, the student wing of the ruling Awami League. I need not
give any references or cite sources for the impunity awarded to the Chatroleague
as they unabatedly commit crime after crime, engage freely in lewd behavior,
extort, rape, murder and fight among themselves without the least bit of fear
of the law. Indeed the thing they fear most is not the law, but their very own
comrades and leaders, who do not think twice before backbiting or backstabbing
for personal gain. Regular reports of women being harassed, molested and raped
at the hands of the Chatroleague is nothing new and a simple google search will
be more than enough in this regard.
This very same Chatroleague has been the filler force of
Shahbag, lending its cadres and supporters as fillers in the programs of
Shahbagh. The presence of the President and Vice President of Chatro League
along with a host of other left leaning student politicians and parties at
almost every significant undertaking of Shahbag has only served to prove that such
gathering could not have successfully materialized without their solid support,
backing or blessing.
In retrospect, the story of Hasnat Abdul Hye was vulgar and
demeaning, but to me, it only served to paint an image that is already prevalent
in an increasingly alarming situation in the political sphere of Bangladesh
today. In this regard, all I can call to account is the outrage the very same
Shahbag showed when Hefazat-e-Islam presented a demand to prevent lewdness,
immodesty and immorality in the name of free mixing of the sexes. Were they
(Hefazat-e-Islam) really wrong or dark aged in their demands? Were their (Hefazat-e-Islam) demands not compliant
with the teachings of the Quran and Sunnah? Has not Shahbag opposed Islam in
opposing the teachings of Islam?
Thousands of questions revolve as I close this post. And
Allah knows best.
No comments:
Post a Comment